REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF ROE DEER IN SLOVENIA

Katarina Flajšman; Ida Jelenko; Boštjan Pokorny

doi:10.15679/bjwr.v1i1.15

REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF ROE DEER IN SLOVENIA

Katarina Flajšman, Ida Jelenko, Boštjan Pokorny

Abstract

European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) is the most important game species in majority of European countries, including Slovenia. Therefore, it is crucial to perform an effective management of this species, which should be based on the knowledge of its population dynamics. Systematic research on reproductive potential (e.g. fertility and potential litter sizes) of roe deer in Slovenia began in 2013. Reproductive organs (uteri with ovaries) of culled roe deer females, i.e. adult does (n = 392) and yearlings (n = 82), were sampled in 45 hunting grounds all around Slovenia during the hunting season, from 1 September to 31 December 2013. Fertility was determined by the presence of corpora lutea in ovaries, and potential litter size by counting their numbers.Results confirmed high fertility of roe deer females in Slovenia. Corpora lutea were present in ovaries of all except two adult does, and only 15.9% of yearlings was infertile, all of them in poor body condition (undressed body mass <11 kg, i.e. without abdominal content, but with head and legs retained). Potential litter size (number of corpora lutea in ovaries) was primarily influenced by doe body mass and age. Mean number of corpora lutea was 1.84 in adult does, and 1.20 in yearlings, respectively. Body mass has a strong positive impact on the potential litter size in both age classes. However, yearlings (primiparous does) perform much higher variability in reproductive potential (i.e. all individuals <10 kg were without any corpus luteum, and all individual >16 kg had 2 corpora lutea). This has to be taken into account when making management decisions. Indeed, particularly selective culling of yearlings in poor condition, i.e. with low body mass, and preserving of heavier individuals, can have a significant impact on fawn production, and hence also on the reproduction of roe deer in the following year(s).

Keywords

Roe deer, reproductive potential, doe fertility, corpus luteum

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andersen R., Duncan P., Linnell J. D. C. (Ed.). (1998): The European roe deer: the biology of success. Oslo, Scandinavian University Press: 376 p.

Andersen R., Linnell J. D. C. (2000): Irruptive potential in roe deer: Density-dependent effects on body mass and fertility. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 3: 698–706.

Apollonio M., Andersen R., Putman R. (Ed.). (2010): European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press: 618 p.

Focardi S., Pelliccioni E. R., Petrucco R., Toso S. 2002. Spatial patterns and density dependence in the dynamics of a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population in central Italy. Oecologia, 130, 3: 411–419.

Gaillard J. M., Sempere A. J., Boutin J. M., Vanlaere G., Boisaubert B. 1992. Effects of age and body-weight on the proportion of females breeding in a population of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70, 8: 1541–1545.

Hewison A. J. M., Gaillard J. M. 2001. Phenotypic quality and senescence affect different components of reproductive output in roe deer. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70, 4: 600–608.

Hamel S., Gaillard J. M., Festa-Bianchet M., Cote, S. D. (2009): Individual quality, early-life conditions, and reproductive success in contrasted populations of large herbivores. Ecology, 90, 7: 1981–1995.

Hewison A. J. M. (1997): Evidence for a genetic component of female fecundity in British roe deer from studies of cranial morphometrics. Functional Ecology, 11, 4: 508–517.

Hlad B., Skoberne P. (Ed.). (2001): Pregled stanja biotske raznovrstnosti in krajinske pestrosti v Sloveniji. Ljubljana, Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor, Agencija Republike Slovenije za okolje: 224 p.

Jarnemo, A., Liberg O., Lockowandt S., Olsson A., Wahlstrom K. (2004): Predation by red fox on European roe deer fawns in relation to age, sex, and birth date. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 82, 3: 416-422.

Jerina K., Stergar M., Videmšek U., Kobler A., Pokorny B., Jelenko I. (2013): Prostorska razširjenost, vitalnost in populacijska dinamika prostoživečih vrst parkljarjev v Sloveniji: preučevanje vplivov okoljskih in vrstno-specifičnih dejavnikov ter napovedovanje razvojnih trendov.Ljubljana, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire: 96 str.

Kjellander P., Hewison A. J. M., Liberg O., Angibault J. M., Bideau E., Cargnelutti B. (2004): Experimental evidence for density-dependence of home range size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolusL.): a comparison of two long-term studies. Oecologia, 139, 3: 478–485.

MacDonald D. W., Johnson P. J. 2008. Sex ratio variation and mixed pairs in roe deer: evidence for control of sex allocation? Oecologia, 158, 2: 361–370.

Nilsen E. B., Gaillard J. M., Andersen R., Odden J., Delorme D., van Laere G., Linnell J. D. C. (2009): A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 3: 585–594.

Nilsen E. B., Linnell J. D. C., Andersen R. (2004): Individual access to preferred habitat affects fitness components in female roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 1: 44–50.

Panzacchi, M., Linnell J. D. C.,Odden M., Andersen R. (2009): Habitat and roe deer fawn vulnerability to red fox predation. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 6: 1124-1133.

Pokorny, B. (2008): Razumevanje ekoloških in drugih bioloških značilnosti srnjadi kot osnova za še boljše upravljanje z vrsto. V: Povzetki in prispevki 1. Slovenskega posveta z mednarodno udeležbo o upravljanju z divjadjo: srnjad. Pokorny B., Savinek K., Poličnik H. (Ed.).Velenje, Erico: p. 47–53.

Pokorny B. (2009): Kako še izboljšati upravljanje s srnjadjo v Sloveniji? Lovec, 92, 3: 130–134.

Pokorny B., Jerina K., Jelenko I. 2012. Zanesljivost makroskopskega (okularnega) ocenjevanja starosti jelenjadi (Cervus elaphus L.) v Sloveniji: Preizkus s štetjem letnih priplastnih plasi zobnega cementa. Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva, 97: 3-18.

Putman R., Apollonio M., Andersen R. (Ed.). (2011): Ungulate management in Europe: Problems and practices. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press: 364 p.

Putman R. (2008): Cultural attitudes and differences in the administration of hunting and deer management in different European countries. V: Pokorny B., Savinek K., Poličnik H., (Ed.). Povzetki inprispevki 1. Slovenskega posveta z mednarodno udeležbo o upravljanju z divjadjo: srnjad. Velenje, Erico: p. 6–11.

Statistični podatki lovskih organizacij Slovenije za obdobje 1961–2011. (2012a): Ljubljana, Lovska zveza Slovenije (neobjavljeno).

Statistični podatki o odvzemu divjadi. (2012b): Ljubljana, Zavod za gozdove Slovenije (neobjavljeno).

Stergar M., Pokorny B., Jelenko I., Jerina K. (2012): Možnosti izpopolnitve kontrolne metode v Sloveniji za še boljše upravljanje z divjadjo. Lovec, 95, 3: 125–128.

Toïgo C., Gaillard J. M., Van Laere G., Hewison M., Morellet N. (2006): How does environmental variation influence body mass, body size, and body condition? Roe deer as a case study. Ecography, 29, 3: 301–308.

Vincent J. P., Bideau E., Hewison A. J. M., Angibault J. M. (1995): The influence of increasing density on body weight, kid reproduction, home-range and winter grouping in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Journal of Zoology, 263: 371–382.

VirjentŠ., Jerina K. (2004):Osrednji slovenski register velike lovne divjadi in velikih zveri v sklopu novega lovsko-informacijskega sistema. Lovec, 86: 280–281.

Wauters L. A., Decrombrugghe S. A., Nour N., Matthysen E. 1995. Do female roe deer in good condition produce more sons than daughters. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 3: 189–193.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15679/bjwr.v1i1.15